meta user
network profile
| bio | website | sydneygrowers.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Australia | |
| age | 93 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | Oct 9 '12 at 9:43 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
I have just kicked off a new gardening blog at http://www.sydneygrowers.com please check it out.
|
Nov 5 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Nov 5 |
accepted | Can anyone find a photo of the “LEGO bricks, not LEGOS” insert? |
|
Nov 4 |
comment |
Can anyone find a photo of the “LEGO bricks, not LEGOS” insert? @Zhaph-BenDuguid - Yes, you did discuss the Lego/Legos thing, but I am specifically after a photo of the mythical insert/catalog. This doesn't actually answer my question. |
|
Nov 4 |
comment |
Can anyone find a photo of the “LEGO bricks, not LEGOS” insert? Just a note, this doesn't answer my question. Although it is similar. It's a good answer, hence the upvotes, but it is not the right answer. |
|
Nov 4 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Nov 4 |
comment |
Can anyone find a photo of the “LEGO bricks, not LEGOS” insert? Just a bit of related nostalgia, here is a photo of a "Susan Williams" letter. |
|
Nov 4 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 4 |
comment |
Can anyone find a photo of the “LEGO bricks, not LEGOS” insert? The problem is I am quite skeptical about the catalog statement and that is what is commonly quoted on the net. Being skeptical, a "used to be available" on a website doesn't quite cut it for me. I opened plenty of sets in the 80s and looked quite thoroughly through catalogs and I don't ever remember such a statement. Surely if it existed one of the fanatics here would have spotted it. |
|
Nov 4 |
asked | Can anyone find a photo of the “LEGO bricks, not LEGOS” insert? |
|
Nov 4 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
