Skip to main content

Timeline for Who are these Figures?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 11, 2019 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackBrix/status/1105166641824968705
Mar 9, 2019 at 15:47 comment added Phillay The sets were identified as Lego Basics 390-1 and 392-2 and I’ve been able to assemble both from my hoard of bricks now that I’ve seen pictures of the vehicles. The figures have Lego stamped inside the legs so I was certain they were original Lego pieces.
Mar 9, 2019 at 15:44 vote accept Phillay
Mar 8, 2019 at 16:42 history edited chicks CC BY-SA 4.0
capitalize LEGO
Mar 8, 2019 at 12:59 answer added Syberion timeline score: 8
Mar 8, 2019 at 11:59 comment added zovits @RobertColumbia I know they weren't designed to be separated, that's why I'm sceptical whether they are LEGO figures at all. Nonetheless, "designed to be not taken apart" =/= "can't be taken apart", especially when talking about kids with seemingly unlimited creativity, tenacity and time. But the well-preserved state of the figures indicates the lack of forceful disassembly attempts, so I'm still not sure enough to warrant an answer.
Mar 8, 2019 at 11:55 comment added Robert Columbia @zovits good points, but both Duplo and Fabuland figures were designed to not be taken apart easily.
Mar 8, 2019 at 11:33 comment added zovits Based on their apparent size they could be Duplo figures, but I couldn't find any exact matches in Bricklink or Brickset (albeit with an admittedly non-exhaustive search). Are you sure these figures are genuine LEGO pieces? Or they could also be mixed up from multiple separate figures: the legs do look like Fabuland, but the heads don't match.
Mar 8, 2019 at 10:08 history edited zovits CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 54 characters in body
Mar 8, 2019 at 9:15 review First posts
Mar 8, 2019 at 10:08
Mar 8, 2019 at 9:15 history asked Phillay CC BY-SA 4.0