Timeline for Any reasons for the introduction of the new-style raised arch?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2014 at 3:42 | vote | accept | RegDwight | ||
| May 20, 2013 at 16:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBrix/status/336526142293041152 | ||
| May 10, 2013 at 6:29 | answer | added | Joubarc | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 12:06 | comment | added | RegDwight | @Voitcus: yes, it is empty as well. In fact if you look at them from the bottom at a straight angle, the two parts look absolutely identical. | |
| May 9, 2013 at 12:03 | comment | added | Voitcus | If I remember correctly, the old arch (the right one) is empty inside, so if it's placed on another brick the studs would go inside. Is the new one also empty? | |
| May 9, 2013 at 11:59 | answer | added | donutsftw | timeline score: 17 | |
| May 9, 2013 at 11:57 | answer | added | Voitcus | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 8, 2013 at 23:14 | review | First posts | |||
| May 9, 2013 at 7:17 | |||||
| May 8, 2013 at 22:59 | history | asked | RegDwight | CC BY-SA 3.0 |