While watching clip of the LEGO Movie, I found a strange part:

40t gear

Slightly earlier in the video, its part number is shown as 3649.

But it doesn't match the 40t gear I know nor the pictures on bricklink.

Is it an error from The LEGO Movie or a variant I don't know?

1 Answer 1


From this image, you can count the teeth well enough to determine there are actually 60 teeth, not 40:

enter image description here

This does not appear to be a real part.

It also appears you aren't the first to notice this. Jim Brickkeeper had created a ShapeWays model based on this movie piece which I found while searching for LEGO 60 tooth gears. It's no longer available, but it might be possible to contact them and see if there is another way to get it made.

According to Matthew Ashton this piece was planned for use in the set, but due to budget changes had to be cut, and has not yet been produced.

For each project we are assigned a certain budget and a certain number of moulds we can create for new pieces. It was our intention with the Movie to make all Characters and Vehicles toys 100%, movie accurate. However in this case the directors really wanted the back wheel to be bigger, so we designed the piece for them, but then later had to make a compromise on one of the models as we didn't have the budget for all the tooling. Lord Business's design had become more complicated and required more moulds than orginally planned.we had to get him 100% correct, so we decided to alter the Super Cycle as we felt it would be less noticeable, at that point we weren't aware that it's part No. would be called out

  • 1
    Oh, nice. Is it usual in this part of stackexchange to directly mark an answer as answered, or should I wait for more answers ?
    – phi
    Commented Oct 14, 2018 at 7:09
  • 2
    @phi It's up to you. Commented Oct 14, 2018 at 7:10
  • The description on shapeways says it was an official unproduced Lego designed element, does anyone have more information on this claim? Commented Oct 15, 2018 at 10:12
  • @MichaelVerschaeve - it might be better to ask that as a new question, especially as this answer is now accepted ;) Commented Oct 15, 2018 at 16:13
  • 1
    @MichaelVerschaeve I've dug up some info on that and added it to the answer. Commented Oct 16, 2018 at 1:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.