A message from our CEO about the future of Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange. Read now.

# Tag Info

12

How firm does it need to be? Wouldn't something like this be enough? If not, you can try to lock the parts into place with "cheese" slopes, but it's not as neat:

11

It appears that some LEGO pieces are designed with the proportions of 45-degree right triangles in mind. For example, the 3x3 plate with one corner removed has a diagonal edge that is very close to three studs long, as can be seen in this construction: Likewise, the 8x8 corner plate has a diagonal edge that is very close to 10 studs long:

11

Hinges can work, I have used this technique before, if you sandwich the hinges between two plates you get 45 degree 'bricks' that are quite solid. In most cases, tiles and plates in the right place will keep sufficient contact with the base plate to have a stable model.

11

45° angles are tricky because of the dimensions of 45-45-90 triangles: The fact that the hypotenuse needs to be a multiple of radical two makes it difficult to build out of LEGO plates which are generally limited to integers or halves. The best you can do in a reasonably small amount of space is a 5 x 5 x 7.07 triangle, but that doesn't come close enough to ...

11

Scale is the obvious answer. The Legoland model is huge, which means you're not seeing the brick-level quantisation as easily (quantisation is most obviously seen in mosaics but that works in 3D too). Getting the same effect at smaller scales usually means a lot of SNOT and using sloped bricks. These days there is a huge range of slopes available, from 4 ...

5

There are many different types. You can find them here: Bricklink - Brick Modified There are also Brackets: Bricklink - Brackets And you could use some of these Bricklink - Plate Modified or, of course, these Bricklink - Hinges

4

I'm not quite sure what you mean, but could you use hinges? Like these?

3

The part# 87087 - "Brick, Modified 1 x 1 with Stud on 1 Side" could work: But the part# 11211 - "Brick, Modified 1 x 2 with Studs on 1 Side" seems better to scale up with:

3

There are many. I believe the classic "Erling"/headlight brick (it was designed by a guy named Erling) is the oldest way, but there's also a number of bricks with studs on the side and a number of brackets.

2

Since no one has answered this, I'll reproduce my comment as an answer: If you are just going for something aesthetically close, and not load bearing, why do you need the hinge piece on the top? Just push the long hinge plate up in to the "awning" and then your problems are solved.

1

Yeah you pretty much have the two choices you outlined... hinges or make it so big that the squareness of the bricks melts into nothingness at that resolution. OR... build your structure over tiles and use single studs, like at the ends of the ends of the hypotenuse of a 3-4-5 triangle... but that will be seriously flimsy the higher you build the walls, ...

Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible